HomeUse Cases › Can I Retire With ₹2 Crore
Retirement & Planning

I have ₹2 crore. Can I retire now, and how long will it actually last?

No Sign-Up. No Paywall.

FREE TO USENO LOGIN REQUIREDUPDATED FY 2026–27
Your Corpus Lasts Until Age
at the spending and inflation you entered

Most retirement pages tell you the corpus you need. This one answers the harder question in the other direction: given the corpus you already have, can you stop working, and if not, by how much are you short.

By Aditya GuptaAccounting & Finance EducatorLast reviewed August 22, 2026Source: PFRDA retirement framework

Why a Large Corpus Can Still Run Out

₹2 crore sounds like enough because it is measured against today’s prices. Retirement is not spent at today’s prices. A household spending ₹80,000 a month now will be spending roughly ₹1.44 lakh a month in fifteen years at 4 percent inflation, and about ₹2.16 lakh at 7 percent. The corpus does not grow to meet that automatically; it has to out-earn inflation while being drawn down at the same time.

The variable that decides the outcome is not the return and not the inflation rate on their own, but the gap between them. A corpus earning 8 percent while inflation runs at 6 percent is compounding at roughly 1.9 percent in real terms. A corpus earning 8 percent while inflation runs at 4 percent is compounding at nearly 3.9 percent, twice as fast, from exactly the same investments. This is why two people with identical corpuses and identical spending can get answers twenty years apart.

The model below does not use a rule of thumb like 4 percent. It runs the balance forward one month at a time, grows the withdrawal every year by your inflation rate, and reports the month the balance reaches zero. It also solves the inverse: the highest monthly spend, in today’s rupees, that the corpus can sustain all the way to your planning age.

Corpus Longevity Model

Money Runs Out at Age
Years the Corpus Lasts
Maximum Sustainable Monthly Spend Today
Corpus Needed for Your Plan
Shortfall or Surplus
Years funded: Years unfunded:
Adjust the inputs above.

How to Read the Result

The maximum sustainable monthly spend is usually the most useful line on this page. It is expressed in today’s rupees and it already contains the annual inflation increase, so it answers the question people actually have: what standard of living does this corpus buy, permanently. If that figure is comfortably above what you spend now, you are not asking whether you can retire, you are asking what to do with the surplus.

The corpus needed line is the same calculation run backwards, and the difference between it and what you hold is the honest size of the gap. Note that the gap is not the amount you need to save. It is the amount you need to have at retirement, so the amount to save is smaller once you allow for the years of compounding between now and then.

Treat every one of these numbers as a single point on a wide distribution. The model assumes a smooth return every month. Real markets deliver the return in a jagged sequence, and a poor sequence in the first five years of drawdown does disproportionate damage because you are selling units at low prices to fund the same withdrawal. That is sequence-of-returns risk, and it is the main argument for holding two to three years of spending in short-duration debt rather than running the whole corpus in equity.

What Changes the Answer

The gap between return and inflation

Not the return alone. A corpus at 8 percent with 6 percent inflation compounds at about 1.9 percent in real terms; at 4 percent inflation it compounds at nearly 3.9 percent. Doubling the real rate roughly halves the corpus you need, which is why the inflation input deserves as much thought as the return input.

Health costs, which do not follow general inflation

Medical inflation in India has consistently run well above headline CPI, and health spending rises exactly when everything else in this model is most fragile. Either raise the inflation assumption, or hold a separate health corpus and a personal insurance policy outside the retirement corpus entirely.

Any income that continues past retirement

Rent, a pension, an annuity, EPS, part-time consulting. Every rupee of continuing income reduces the withdrawal, and reducing the withdrawal in the early years is worth much more than the same reduction later because the corpus keeps compounding on the money you did not take out.

The order in which returns arrive

The model applies a smooth monthly return. A bad first three years followed by a good decade produces a materially worse outcome than the same returns in the opposite order, even though the average is identical. Holding near-term spending in cash and short-duration debt is the standard defence.

How We Calculated This

Balance drawn down month by month, not by a fixed withdrawal rate
Withdrawal rises once a year by the inflation you enter
Return credited monthly at a constant rate
No tax on withdrawals is modelled, so treat the return as post-tax
No pension, rent or annuity income unless you net it off the spend
Sustainable spend solved by bisection to your planning age

The Decision Framework

1
Start from the sustainable spend, not the corpus
Ask what monthly standard of living this corpus supports for life. If that number is above your current spending, the retirement decision is already made and the remaining questions are about asset allocation and tax.
2
Stress the inflation input, not the return input
Most people already discount their return assumption. Very few raise their inflation assumption. Run the model at your expected inflation and again two points higher, and see whether the answer survives.
3
Value continuing income correctly
A part-time income of ₹30,000 a month for the first five years is worth far more than ₹18 lakh, because it leaves the corpus untouched during the years it has the longest time to compound. Any bridge income is the cheapest way to close a shortfall.
4
Carve out the near-term spending
Keep two to three years of withdrawals in liquid and short-duration debt so that a bad market does not force you to sell equity to buy groceries. The rest of the corpus can then be invested for the horizon it actually has.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 4 percent withdrawal rule valid in India?+
It travels badly. The rule came from United States data with lower long-run inflation and a different asset mix. Indian inflation has generally run higher, which pushes the sustainable rate down, while Indian nominal returns have generally run higher, which pushes it up. Rather than importing a single number, solve for your own sustainable spend using your own inflation and return assumptions, which is what the model above does.
Should I use nominal or real returns in this model?+
The model takes nominal figures for both return and inflation and does the real-rate arithmetic internally, month by month. Do not subtract inflation from your return before entering it, or you will double-count the adjustment and the answer will look far worse than it is.
Does this account for tax on withdrawals?+
No. Enter a post-tax return to keep the answer honest. Equity gains above the annual exemption are taxed on redemption, debt fund gains are taxed at slab rates, and the exact drag depends on your holdings and your income in each year of retirement.
What if I retire and then go back to work part-time?+
That is the single most effective response to a shortfall. Subtract the part-time income from your monthly spending figure and re-run the model. Even a modest income for the first five years usually adds far more years to the corpus than the same amount saved earlier, because it protects the corpus at its point of maximum compounding.
How much should stay in equity after retirement?+
Enough to beat inflation over a thirty-year horizon, which usually means a meaningful equity allocation, but not so much that a bad two-year sequence forces you to sell at the bottom. A common structure is two to three years of withdrawals in liquid and short-duration debt, with the remainder invested for the long horizon it genuinely has.
Why does my answer change so much when I move inflation by one point?+
Because the corpus compounds on the gap between return and inflation, not on the return. Moving inflation from 6 to 7 percent against an 8 percent return cuts the real rate from about 1.9 percent to about 0.9 percent, which is a halving. Small changes in the inputs produce large changes in the answer, and that sensitivity is a genuine feature of the problem rather than a defect of the model.

Sources and Method References

Advertisement